2023-06-26: Select Board

Click timestamps in the text to watch that part of the meeting recording.

Swampscott Select Board Meeting Analysis: June 26, 2023

This document provides an analysis of the Swampscott Select Board meeting based on the provided transcript.

Section 1: Agenda

Based on the transcript, the likely flow of the meeting was as follows:

  1. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance 0:01:39
  2. Chair’s Opening Remarks & Procedural Changes 0:02:18 (Including comments on recent racist incident)
  3. Select Board Member Remarks on Racism & Juneteenth (Including video playback) 0:04:34
  4. Town Administrator’s Report 0:21:14 (Moved earlier than posted agenda)
    • Response to Hate Crime/Community Values
    • Building Report (Over 100 years old)
    • State of the Region Update (Lynn Chamber)
    • Fiscal Year Close Update (Department Budgets)
    • DPW Update (Summer Staff, Planting, Crosswalks, Paving)
    • Senior Center Update (Volunteer Appreciation, Kitchen Project Q&A 0:34:30)
    • Health Department Update (Climate Action, Composting, Narcan, Aging Plan)
    • Veterans Services Update (Coffee Hour)
    • ARPA Funding Update
    • Recreation Department Update (Juneteenth/Pride coordination, Strawberry Fest, Humphrey St Block Party planning 0:36:09)
    • Building Department Update (Permits, Revenue)
    • Police Department Update (Pistols replacement, Hiring Q&A 0:36:41)
    • Fire Department Update (Promotions, Hiring)
    • HR Update (Evaluations, Goal Setting)
    • School Capital Needs Update
    • MBTA Communities Zoning (3A) Grant Impact Update
    • Town Clerk Update (New Asst. Town Clerk, Town Reports)
    • Assessing Department Update (Patriot Property Contract, AssessPro Upgrade)
    • Kings Beach Update (Funding Efforts, UV System Questions 0:37:40)
  5. Public Comment 0:39:23
    • Liz Smith re: Harbor & Waterfront Advisory Committee appointment process 0:40:05
  6. New Business: Discussion & Possible Vote on Draft RFP for 10 New Ocean St. & 12-24 Pine St. (Veterans Housing) 0:41:52 (Moved earlier than posted agenda)
  7. Public Hearing Continuation: HOLCIM-NER, INC. Earth Removal Permit 1:08:19
  8. New Business: Discussion on Next Steps for Charter Review and Community Preservation Act 1:14:00 (Moved earlier than posted agenda)
  9. Votes of the Board: Consent Agenda Discussion & Votes 1:27:25 (Items pulled: Swampscott Yacht Club Entertainment License 1:28:51, Granite Coast Brewery One-Day Liquor License 1:30:29)
  10. Joint Meeting with Swampscott Contributory Retirement Board: COLA Increase Request 1:48:16
  11. New Business: Pedestrian Safety/Traffic Updates 2:36:35
    • Police Presentation (Education, Engineering, Enforcement) 2:38:01
    • Discussion on Phillips Beach Area Parking Proposal 3:22:23
    • Public Comment on Phillips Beach Parking 3:35:33
  12. Select Board Time 4:36:31
    • Member Rappaport: Climate Action Plan update, Community First Grant, Feast to Fight Hunger, Housing Authority meeting notes, Senior Center meeting notes.
    • Member Kinney: Request to start meetings at 6:30 PM, Open Space/Rec request re: Hadley Playground in RFP, Lynn Ferry status, Request for allergy-friendly candy at parades.
    • Member Grischke: Announcement of 4th of July Races at Phillips Park.
  13. Scheduling Next Meeting 4:35:34
  14. Adjournment 4:43:01

Section 2: Speaking Attendees

Based on transcript context and typical MA Town Government roles:

  • David Grischman (Select Board Chair): [Speaker 4] (Calls meeting to order, manages flow, refers to “board colleagues,” mentions setting the agenda, takes lead on Holcim hearing, introduces Charter Review discussion).
  • Peter Spellios (Select Board Member): [Speaker 1] (Speaks after Chair on racism/Juneteenth, presents Pine St RFP, asks detailed questions on RFP/40B/Ground Lease 0:48:52, engages on gun destruction policy 0:38:15, questions police data/enforcement approach [2:10:10, 4:25:03], makes motions, refers to his MMA role). Name “Peter” used 0:04:32.
  • Sean Fitzgerald (Town Administrator): [Speaker 3] (Presents Town Administrator’s report 0:21:14, answers operational questions, comments on community values, provides context on veterans housing 1:05:17, discusses liquor license impacts 1:43:12, responds to parking proposal process 4:14:30). Name “Sean” used [0:34:24, 0:39:22].
  • Doug Thompson (Select Board Member): [Speaker 7] (Asks clarifying questions on Pine St RFP 0:47:21, questions COLA financial impact vs. human impact 1:52:21, suggests splitting liquor license vote 1:42:01, questions police presentation re: speed tables plan 4:23:30, presents updates during Select Board Time). Name “Doug” used [1:06:56, 1:27:41, 4:36:12].
  • Mary Ellen Fletcher (Select Board Member): [Speaker 8] (Asks questions about Senior Center kitchen 0:34:30, police hiring 0:36:41, Humphrey St block party 0:36:09, Kings Beach meeting 0:37:40. Pulls items from Consent Agenda 1:28:05, raises concerns about frequency of liquor licenses/community impact 1:30:29. Discusses COLA impact, suggests means-testing/ARPA funds 1:56:57. Asks about parking problem definition 3:29:38. Mentions constituents contacting her, running for Select Board, past Finance Committee role. Name “Mary Ellen” used [0:53:04, 1:28:05, 1:43:14].
  • Katie Phelan Kinney (Select Board Member): [Speaker 9] (Interjects during opening 1:23, asks about Pine St RFP unit sizes for families 0:59:38, makes motion on Holcim hearing 1:08:45. Expresses concern about alcohol at family events 1:34:27. Asks Police Captain to pause presentation 2:37:50. Questions additional parking counts [3:24:06, 3:29:04]. Expresses desire for working group on parking 4:11:58, requests specific map data. During Select Board Time, requests 6:30 start, mentions OSRP/Hadley, Lynn Ferry, allergy-friendly candy. Name “Katie” used [1:23:06, 1:40:44].
  • Rev. Dr. Andre Bennett (Guest Speaker via Recording): [Speaker 6] (Delivers speech played during the meeting regarding Juneteenth, freedom, racism, and equality). Introduced by Member Spellios 0:05:11.
  • Liz Smith (Resident/Public Commenter): [Speaker 15] (Identifies self, Precinct 3 resident, asks for clarity on committee appointment process 0:40:05).
  • John L. Dean (Retirement Board Vice Chair): [Speaker 5] (Identifies self as Vice Chair 1:48:40, leads Retirement Board presentation on COLA request, conducts roll call, responds to Select Board questions/comments [2:05:12, 2:17:25]). Name “John Dean” mentioned 1:50:56.
  • Amy Saro (Finance Director): [Speaker 14] (Presents financial implications of COLA increase 1:49:30, clarifies MMA position 1:50:56, clarifies monthly cost of COLA 2:00:02, clarifies funding schedule methodology 2:08:06). Title mentioned 1:49:15. Also serves on Retirement Board, confirmed by roll call 1:48:39.
  • Eric Hartman (Finance Committee Chair): [Speaker 17] (Identifies self, provides Finance Committee’s feedback on COLA request via Zoom 2:01:25). Title mentioned 2:00:54.
  • Diane/Marissa/Town Staff: [Speaker 16] (Provides information on Yacht Club license history 1:29:51, Retirement Board adjournment procedure 2:36:04, Phillips Beach parking side alternation 3:24:25). Likely Town Clerk staff or Assistant Town Administrator. Name “Diane” used 1:29:39. Name “Marissa” mentioned 1:29:46.
  • Joe Dulette (Health Director inferred): [Speaker 22] (Brief interjections, possibly managing tech/recording [2:15, 1:03:02]. Name “Joe Dulette” mentioned re: PSAs 3:06:32).
  • Police Lieutenant (Name not stated, likely Fraylor): [Speaker 13] (Brief comment during Pledge 1:48). Lt. Fraylor mentioned as present [0:28:40, 2:38:40].
  • Joseph R. Cable (Police Captain): [Speaker 2] (Presents detailed Pedestrian Safety/Traffic Update 2:38:01, responds to questions about enforcement, bias, engineering solutions. Discusses parking issues 3:26:29. Name “Captain Cable” used [2:36:43, 3:16:24, 4:17:18]).
  • John Lloyd (Police Sergeant): [Speaker 18] (Presents Traffic Committee recommendation on Phillips Beach parking 3:22:41). Name “Sergeant Lloyd” used 3:22:30. Sergeant John Moore also mentioned as present 2:38:40.
  • Marcie Foley (Community Development Director inferred): [Speaker 21] (Provides specific parking space counts for Phillips Beach proposal 3:29:29). Name “Marcie” used [3:24:25, 4:41:00].
  • Barry Craft (Resident/Public Commenter): [Speaker 12] (Identifies self, Blodgett Ave resident, questions need for more beach parking, presents data analysis based on tickets suggesting non-resident issue 3:36:04).
  • Cheryl Levinson (Resident/Public Commenter): [Speaker 15] (Identifies self, Sheppard Ave resident, raises concerns about confusing signs, switching parking sides, trash, and non-resident parking 3:43:47).
  • Kevin Reen (Resident/Public Commenter/Police Officer): [Speaker 10] (Identifies self, Ocean Ave resident and town police officer, raises significant safety concerns about proposed parking due to street width, lack of sidewalks, traffic congestion, sightlines, younger population 3:47:37).
  • Rachel Teradash (Resident/Public Commenter): [Speaker 20] (Identifies self, Middlesex Ave resident, speaks in favor of additional beach parking due to personal difficulty finding spots, connects safety concerns to other streets like Middlesex 3:54:49).
  • Jared Bridge (Resident/Public Commenter): [Speaker 13] (Identifies self, Shepherd Ave resident, reiterates sign confusion, argues the primary issue is lack of enforcement, not lack of spaces, provides examples of non-stickered parking 3:56:21).
  • Mara Lau (Resident/Public Commenter/Town Meeting Member): [Speaker 11] (Identifies self, Outlook Road, Precinct 3 TMM, expresses concern about town-wide speed/safety, student pedestrian safety, need for more enforcement, impaired driving (pot), specific dangerous intersections (Burrell/Norfolk, Humphrey/Monument, Farragut/Monument), need for female/minority police officers 4:01:48).
  • Sarah Climate (Resident/Public Commenter): [Speaker 19] (Identifies self, Shepherd Ave resident, raises safety concerns about increased parking impacting young children playing on the street, questions emergency vehicle access 4:08:59).
  • Bob Powell (Retirement Board Member): [Speaker 16] (Speaks after Retirement Board Vice Chair, acknowledges retiring teacher Mr. Reid, clarifies FinCom discussion nuance, provides budget context for COLA impact, expresses personal commitment to retirees 2:32:31). Name “Bob Powell” mentioned 2:13:32.
  • Gino Cresta (DPW Director inferred): [Speaker 19] (Brief interjection re: Chief Archer 3:29:09). Mentioned by name re: crosswalks 0:24:40, signage 4:04:39, speed pillows 4:21:41. Likely present but tag not clearly identifiable.

Section 3: Meeting Minutes

Meeting: Swampscott Select Board Date: June 26, 2023 (Inferred from context and metadata) Location: Swampscott Town Hall (Inferred)

1. Call to Order & Opening Remarks 0:01:39 Chair David Grischman called the meeting to order, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. He announced changes to the agenda order (Town Administrator’s Report moved up) and new seating arrangements. He requested board members direct comments through the chair to improve decorum and efficiency 0:02:18.

2. Remarks on Racism and Community Values 0:03:10 Chair Grischman addressed a recent racist incident at the Clark School basketball court, condemning it and reaffirming the town’s commitment to being anti-racist. He praised board colleagues for organizing and participating in responsive events. Member Peter Spellios followed up, referencing the recent Juneteenth celebration and the importance of remembering history while striving for progress 0:04:34. He introduced and played a recording of Reverend Dr. Andre Bennett’s powerful speech from the Juneteenth event [0:06:56 - 20:55], highlighting themes of freedom, equality, lived experiences of racism, and the need for genuine empowerment alongside support.

3. Town Administrator’s Report 0:21:14 Town Administrator (TA) Sean Fitzgerald presented his report:

  • Hate Crime Response: Echoed the Chair’s sentiments, contrasting the incident with positive community events like Juneteenth and Pride Month (noting police wearing Pride pins). Emphasized the need for continued work on inclusivity and diversity, particularly in housing.
  • Fiscal Update: Discussed the end of the fiscal year, noting Public Safety departments likely ending in the red but the overall budget remaining balanced. Transfers will be needed.
  • DPW: Highlighted summer hiring, planting, rainbow crosswalk painting (thanking the School Department for the request), beach preparations, and recent paving of 16 streets.
  • Senior Center: Mentioned volunteer appreciation and provided an update on the delayed kitchen renovation project, citing redesign for electric appliances and RFP delays 0:34:44. Member Fletcher requested a firmer timeline.
  • Health/Veterans/ARPA: Updated on climate action, composting, Narcan use, aging plan discussions, veterans’ coffee hours, and ARPA fund status ($4.57M received), suggesting strategic discussions on uses like property acquisition.
  • Recreation: Noted the department’s coordination of Juneteenth and Pride events, the success of Strawberry Fest, and plans for the Humphrey Street Summer Block Party 0:36:09, confirming coordination with local businesses.
  • Building/Police/Fire: Provided permit numbers, update on police pistol replacement (leading to Member Spellios requesting a policy change to destroy old firearms rather than trade-in 0:38:15, which the TA agreed to implement), and updates on Fire/Police promotional processes and hiring timelines 0:36:41.
  • HR/Schools/Zoning/Staffing: Covered staff evaluations, school capital needs report availability, potential grant losses for non-compliance with MBTA Communities 3A zoning, introduction of the new Assistant Town Clerk, and assessing software upgrade.
  • Kings Beach: Reported ongoing work with Lynn and state/federal agencies on funding ($20M sought) and addressing technical questions regarding the proposed UV treatment system 0:37:40. Confirmed a public meeting is planned for mid-July.

4. Public Comment 0:39:23 Liz Smith (Precinct 3) requested clarity on the Board & Committee appointment process, expressing frustration about applying for the Harbor & Waterfront Advisory Committee (HWAC) after a position was seemingly filled but before the official vote 0:40:05. The Chair noted the Board listens but doesn’t typically respond during public comment.

5. New Business: Pine Street Veterans Housing RFP 0:41:52 Member Spellios presented the draft Request for Proposals (RFP) for the redevelopment of 10 New Ocean St. & 12-24 Pine St. into veterans’ affordable housing and a veterans’ center. Key points:

  • Project approved at May Town Meeting; closing scheduled for July 17th pending due diligence (environmental/geotechnical reports awaited 0:47:45).
  • First reading of RFP; second reading planned for July. RFP to be posted online for public comment.
  • Timeline aims to align with state tax credit financing cycles, similar to the Michon School project.
  • Anticipated as a Local Initiative Petition (LIP), a “friendly” 40B project, requiring 100% affordability with veteran preference 0:48:52. ZBA approval will be needed.
  • Discussed ground lease vs. sale 0:50:54, noting Michon used a ground lease but questioning its long-term value for residential projects. RFP gives preference to ground lease.
  • Discussed Area Median Income (AMI) levels 0:53:39, likely targeting 60% and 30% AMI based on funding availability, but open to discussion.
  • Discussed local preference 0:55:57, noting state limitations (typically up to 70%) due to fair housing laws. Veteran preference is generally accepted. RFP includes language favoring local preference 0:58:49. Consultation with the Veterans Agent on demographics and needs was discussed [1:03:19, 1:05:17].
  • TA Fitzgerald highlighted the project’s significance as a unique state investment and the opportunity presented by Gen. Andrea Gayle Bennett’s appointment as Undersecretary of Veteran Affairs 1:05:17.
  • Board members requested the VFW space square footage (currently blank in draft) be filled in before the second reading [0:53:27, 0:59:27].

6. Public Hearing Continuation: Holcim Earth Removal Permit 1:08:19 The public hearing continued from June 7th. Chair Grischman stated the Board recommends a 90-day extension of the existing permit and intends to enter settlement negotiations with Holcim’s counsel. Motion: Member Spellios moved to continue the earth removal permit and the public hearing to September 20, 2023, at 7:00 PM. Seconded by Member Fletcher [Inferred]. Vote: Approved unanimously (Aye: 5). 1:11:22

7. New Business: Charter Review Process 1:14:00 Chair Grischman proposed a timeline and process for reviewing the Town Charter and bylaws, anticipating recommendations from the Town Study Committee for a Special Town Meeting in the fall. The process involves soliciting input from committees, Town Meeting Members, the public (via website link), and town staff by September 10th. The Select Board would then discuss, refine with Town Counsel, and finalize proposed warrant articles in October for a Nov/Dec Special Town Meeting.

  • Discussion emphasized the need for public transparency and engagement 1:17:19. Member Kinney suggested outreach at events like the Farmer’s Market to educate citizens 1:23:07. Member Spellios noted this process differs from the previous Charter Review Committee structure but could be more robust by centralizing discussion at the Select Board 1:18:57. TA Fitzgerald supported outreach efforts 1:24:03. The Board agreed to explore setting up a presence at the Farmer’s Market 1:26:47.

8. Votes of the Board: Consent Agenda 1:27:25 The Chair reviewed the consent agenda process. Member Fletcher requested removal of items 2 (Yacht Club Entertainment License) and 4 (Granite Coast One-Day Liquor License) for discussion 1:28:05. Motion: To approve the remainder of the Consent Agenda (Items 1, 3, 5: Climate Action Plan Adoption, VFW Fireworks Liquor License, May 24 Minutes). Seconded. Vote: Approved unanimously (Aye: 5). 1:28:51

  • Item 2: Swampscott Yacht Club Entertainment License: Member Fletcher questioned if it was new or renewal and raised concerns about potential noise near residences 1:28:51. Staff confirmed it was a new application 1:29:51. TA Fitzgerald noted complaints could lead to revocation. Motion: Member Fletcher moved to approve the license. Seconded. Vote: Approved unanimously (Aye: 5). 1:30:19
  • Item 4: Granite Coast Brewery One-Day Liquor License (Summer Concert Series): Member Fletcher reported constituent concerns about the frequency of events with alcohol and the perception of it detracting from family atmosphere, also questioning impact on nearby businesses 1:30:29. Member Kinney echoed concerns about messaging to youth and the necessity of alcohol at family events 1:34:27. Chair Grischman argued it supports local business via foot traffic and builds community 1:32:18. Member Spellios noted the low attendance historically at the concert series, the limited number of dates requested (two), the Rec Department’s efforts, and the lack of past incidents 1:35:58. He highlighted that the Board only sees events requiring liquor licenses, not the full scope of Rec activities. TA Fitzgerald emphasized the goal of increasing foot traffic and community connection post-pandemic 1:43:12. Member Spellios requested a future agenda item for a broader policy discussion on town event liquor licenses 1:39:22, which Member Fletcher supported 1:40:25. Member Thompson suggested approving only the first date (7/12) and revisiting 1:42:01. Motion: Member Thompson moved to approve the one-day license for July 12th only. Seconded by Member Spellios [Inferred]. Vote: Approved (Aye: 3 - Grischman, Spellios, Thompson; Nay: 2 - Fletcher, Kinney). 1:48:00 Staff was asked to prepare information for a policy discussion at the next meeting [1:46:20, 1:47:02].

9. Joint Meeting: Retirement Board COLA Request 1:48:16 The Select Board held a joint meeting with the Swampscott Contributory Retirement Board (SCRB) to continue discussion on the SCRB’s request for an additional 2% Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) on top of the standard 3%, for a total 5% COLA for FY24.

  • SCRB Vice Chair John Dean opened the SCRB meeting 1:48:19.
  • Finance Director Amy Saro presented the financial impact: an estimated $860,000 increase to the unfunded liability by 2031 1:49:30. She noted the Mass Municipal Association (MMA) opposed the enabling legislation due to fiscal burden, though the compromise was local approval 1:50:56.
  • Member Thompson argued passionately for approval, emphasizing the service of retirees, their ineligibility for Social Security, the high inflation context (compared to 8% SS COLA), the low base pensions for many ($14k avg), the small monthly impact ($10-$20), and the fact that most other communities approved it 1:52:21. He calculated the cost as $42 per taxpayer in 2031.
  • Member Fletcher found it a hard decision, acknowledging constituent feedback but concerned about the $150M total unfunded liability (Pension + OPEB). She proposed denying the blanket 2% increase but exploring a means-tested approach using ARPA funds for retirees below a certain income threshold 1:56:57. TA Fitzgerald confirmed ARPA funds could potentially be used this way 1:59:27. Ms. Saro clarified the extra COLA impact is max $280/year or $23.33/month 2:00:02.
  • Finance Committee Chair Eric Hartman reported (via Zoom) the FinCom was divided (2 support, 3 lean against/oppose, 1 absent opposed), citing the large unfunded liabilities as the primary concern despite acknowledging potential affordability arguments based on updated forecasts 2:01:25.
  • SCRB Vice Chair Dean clarified the 5% modeling in the actuarial schedule was done proactively to show potential impact, not pre-approval 2:07:11. Ms. Saro confirmed this 2:08:13.
  • Member Spellios expressed struggle, noting the current liability stems from past underfunding 2:10:10. He raised significant equity concerns about granting this COLA to retirees while current employee unions might demand the same, which the town budget couldn’t sustain 2:11:58. He acknowledged the retirees’ situation but felt he couldn’t support the request due to broader fiscal implications and equity issues.
  • TA Fitzgerald echoed concerns about the fiscal burden, healthcare cost increases (22% in 4 years), and competing needs (infrastructure, parks, senior services) 2:17:32. He suggested exploring healthcare improvements or targeted ARPA aid instead of the blanket COLA.
  • SCRB Vice Chair Dean reiterated the board’s fiduciary duty, the system’s strong investment performance (Top 12 statewide), the contractual nature of Chapter 32 pensions, the unique situation of fixed-income retirees, and urged approval 2:22:03.
  • SCRB Member Bob Powell acknowledged retiring teacher Mr. Reid, clarified FinCom discussion nuance, noted the pension contribution as a percentage of budget is projected to decrease, and stated his commitment to retirees 2:32:31.
  • Motion: Member Thompson moved to support the Retirement Board’s recommendation for the additional 2% COLA. Seconded by Member Fletcher. 2:35:25
  • Vote: Approved (Aye: 3 - Thompson, Fletcher, Kinney; Nay: 2 - Grischman, Spellios). 2:35:54
  • The Retirement Board adjourned its meeting 2:36:05.

10. New Business: Pedestrian Safety/Traffic Updates 2:36:35 Police Captain Joseph Cable, accompanied by Lt. Fraylor and Sgt. John Moore, presented a comprehensive update. Key points:

  • Philosophy: Emphasized the “3 E’s” - Engineering, Education, Enforcement, prioritizing Engineering as the most effective long-term solution 2:41:12. Compared ineffective enforcement to the “war on drugs,” advocating for root cause solutions.
  • Engineering: Discussed self-enforcing roadways, road diets, lane narrowing, speed humps/pillows (citing Boston’s citywide plan 2:45:19), intersection redesign (eliminating slip lanes, considering no turn on red), crosswalk safety (highlighting 90 Humphrey St. dangers 2:49:20), flashing beacons, raised crosswalks, potential for traffic cameras, visibility enhancements (bump-outs, parking removal).
  • Education: Focused on vulnerable populations (youth/elderly), pedestrian behavior contributing to accidents (NHTSA data showing pedestrian fault in many cases 3:04:34), potential for PSA campaigns, school programs, and partnerships (e.g., Scouts painting warnings 3:06:09).
  • Enforcement: Acknowledged police role in addressing OUI and speed 3:07:24. Highlighted challenges: limited resources (often 1-2 officers available), high cost, temporary impact (citing Stetson Ave example where speeds increased immediately after patrol left 3:11:24), difficulty of productive pedestrian violation enforcement, and technology (Waze alerting drivers 3:12:47).
  • Bias Concerns: Addressed the “elephant in the room” 3:13:28, explaining why traffic enforcement requires careful attention to bias (discretion, potential impact of residency/vehicle condition bias manifesting racially in Swampscott’s demographics, consequences for court/DA relations, community legitimacy). Cited state reviews finding no bias but stressed the importance of avoiding even the appearance of bias.
  • Swampscott Enforcement Data (2020): Presented data showing Swampscott ranked 3rd regionally in total citations (behind Lynn/Salem) but 1st by far in citations per officer (59.3 vs. 16.8 average) 3:19:04. Compared favorably to budget peer communities as well 4:20:27. Noted staffing reductions since 2020 make these levels likely unsustainable 4:22:01.
  • Future: Recommended focus on engineering, installing temporary speed pillows (one installed on Stetson Ave 4:21:41), engaging engineering expertise, using Risk Terrain Modeling software 4:23:03.
  • Board Discussion: Member Thompson inquired about the plan for more speed tables 4:23:30. Captain Cable indicated a plan exists but expert review is intended. Member Spellios expressed frustration 4:25:03, questioning why engineering solutions hadn’t been prioritized sooner given the Captain’s long-stated preference for them and the perceived ineffectiveness/public dissatisfaction with enforcement despite high citation rates. He urged a proactive, not defensive, approach and willingness to try solutions without fear of mistakes. Captain Cable agreed it was “beyond time” to act 4:31:08. Member Kinney noted the disconnect between high enforcement stats and resident perception, suggesting multiple solutions are needed 4:31:20. Member Thompson confirmed two more portable speed tables are available 4:33:28. TA Fitzgerald confirmed they can be deployed upon public safety recommendation 4:33:53. Member Spellios suggested revisiting the Select Board’s role as “commissioners of streets” in the charter review 4:34:10.

11. New Business: Phillips Beach Area Parking Proposal 3:22:23 Police Sergeant John Lloyd presented the Traffic Study Committee’s recommendation: allow one-sided parking (alternating sides yearly) on Ocean Ave, Bradley Ave, and Shepherd Ave, and increase the parking violation fee from $25 to $50 3:22:41.

  • Goal: Increase parking availability for residents with beach stickers, particularly during peak weekend afternoons 3:29:38.
  • Estimated spaces added: ~127 (odd side) or ~100 (even side), roughly doubling existing capacity 3:31:34.
  • Fire Chief Archer reportedly approved the one-sided parking for apparatus clearance 3:25:54.
  • Member Spellios expressed inclination to support increased parking but felt the proposal needed more data on implementation safety (sightlines, curb cut distances) before a vote 3:33:14. Member Kinney requested maps showing specific locations and distances 4:11:58.
  • Public Comment: Significant resident turnout, primarily from the affected neighborhood.
    • Barry Craft (Blodgett Ave) questioned the need, presenting data suggesting non-resident parking (ticket analysis) is the main issue, not lack of resident spaces 3:36:04. Argued higher fines ($50-75) would deter non-residents.
    • Cheryl Levinson (Shepherd Ave) strongly opposed alternating sides due to existing confusion over signs and safety issues with blind driveways on one side 3:43:47. Repeatedly requested clearer signage (color/size). Noted trash issues.
    • Kevin Reen (Ocean Ave/Police Officer) detailed major safety concerns: narrow street width (24ft) on upper Ocean Ave creating potential gridlock with two-sided parking and emergency vehicles, lack of sidewalks near beach entrances, complex intersections, increased child population, obstructed sightlines from driveways 3:47:37. Urged a formal traffic study.
    • Rachel Teradash (Middlesex Ave) spoke in favor, describing personal difficulty finding parking as a resident driving with children 3:54:49. Urged safety focus on other streets as well.
    • Jared Bridge (Shepherd Ave) argued enforcement is the key issue, citing frequent non-stickered parking and lack of ticketing on weekends/holidays 3:56:21. Reiterated sign confusion.
    • Mara Lau (Outlook Rd/TMM Pct 3) spoke on broader town safety, student pedestrian dangers, impaired driving (pot), specific intersection issues, and need for female/minority officers 4:01:48.
    • Sarah Climate (Shepherd Ave) expressed safety concerns for young children playing on streets with significantly increased parking/traffic 4:08:59. Questioned emergency vehicle access confirmation.
  • Board Decision: The Board agreed the proposal required more information and study. Motion: Member Spellios moved to table the discussion until staff could provide more detailed information (maps, sightline analysis, specific counts). Seconded by Member Kinney. Vote: Approved unanimously (Aye: 5). 4:16:40 Member Fletcher’s suggestion to immediately increase fines and improve signs was deferred pending the holistic review 4:13:45. TA Fitzgerald committed to providing maps and analysis after site walks and potentially neighborhood meetings 4:14:30.

12. Select Board Time 4:36:31

  • Member Thompson provided updates on the Climate Action Plan implementation, Community First weatherization grant outreach, recent community events (Feast to Fight Hunger), Housing Authority meeting takeaways, and Senior Center engagement, noting recurring themes of residents struggling with affordability and service needs.
  • Member Kinney requested future meetings start at 6:30 PM due to commute issues, relayed an Open Space & Rec request regarding the Hadley Playground in the hotel RFP, noted the Lynn Ferry opening, and asked for consideration of allergy-friendly candy at town parades.
  • Member Fletcher announced the return of 4th of July races at Phillips Park, benefiting the Anchor Food Pantry.

13. Scheduling & Adjournment The next meeting was scheduled for July 12th at 6:30 PM (pushed back one week from the 5th to allow staff preparation time) 4:35:34. Items tabled from this meeting (Board/Commission appointments, CPA discussion, Liaisons) will be added. Motion: To adjourn. Seconded. Vote: Approved unanimously (Aye: 5). 4:43:09

Section 4: Executive Summary

This Swampscott Select Board meeting covered significant community issues, including addressing racism, advancing affordable housing, debating fiscal policy concerning retirees, and tackling persistent traffic safety and parking concerns.

Community Values & Response to Racism: The meeting began on a somber note, addressing a recent racist incident 0:03:10. Chair Grischman and Member Spellios condemned the act, reaffirming the town’s commitment to anti-racism. The Board played a powerful speech by Rev. Dr. Andre Bennett from the Juneteenth celebration, emphasizing the ongoing struggle for true freedom and equality 0:06:56. The Town Administrator also highlighted community events like Pride month as signs of inclusivity but stressed the need for concrete actions, particularly in housing, to support diversity 0:21:14.

Veterans Affordable Housing Project Moves Forward: The Board reviewed a draft RFP for the Pine Street redevelopment project, aimed at creating veterans’ affordable housing and a new veterans’ center 0:41:52. Approved by Town Meeting in May, the project is expected to follow the “friendly 40B” model used for the Michon School, targeting 100% affordability primarily through state tax credits. Key details like specific unit counts, AMI levels, and local preference percentages are still under discussion, with input sought from the Veterans Agent and the public. Due diligence on the property purchase is ongoing ahead of a planned July 17th closing 0:47:45. This project represents a significant town commitment to veteran services, potentially creating a unique facility in the Commonwealth 1:05:17.

Retiree COLA Approved Amid Fiscal Debate: In a joint session with the Retirement Board, the Select Board narrowly approved (3-2 vote) an additional 2% Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) for town retirees, bringing the total FY24 COLA to 5% 1:48:16. Proponents (Members Thompson, Fletcher, Kinney) emphasized retiree contributions, high inflation impacting fixed incomes, low base pensions for many, and alignment with other towns 1:52:21. Opponents (Chair Grischman, Member Spellios) raised serious concerns about the $860k long-term liability impact, the town’s existing $150M unfunded pension/OPEB liabilities stemming from past underfunding, and potential equity issues with current employee contracts [1:50:45, 2:10:10]. A proposal to use ARPA funds for means-tested relief was raised as an alternative 1:56:57 but the board ultimately voted on the original request. The decision highlights the ongoing tension between fiscal responsibility and supporting former employees in an inflationary environment.

Traffic Safety & Parking Debates: Extensive time was dedicated to pedestrian safety and neighborhood parking.

  • Traffic Safety Presentation: Police Captain Cable presented a detailed analysis, emphasizing engineering solutions (speed humps, intersection redesign, better crosswalks) as the most effective long-term approach over enforcement 2:38:01. He presented data showing Swampscott’s high traffic citation rate per officer compared to neighbors 3:19:04 but argued enforcement has limits due to staffing, technology (Waze), and the need to maintain community trust by avoiding biased practices 3:13:28. While the board acknowledged the engineering focus, Member Spellios criticized the perceived defensiveness and lack of progress on implementing such solutions despite long-standing issues 4:25:03. The discussion underscored a disconnect between enforcement statistics and resident perception of safety. One temporary speed pillow was installed on Stetson Ave 4:21:41, with plans to deploy two more soon 4:33:53.
  • Phillips Beach Parking: A proposal to add ~100-127 parking spaces near Phillips Beach by allowing one-sided, alternating-year parking on Ocean, Bradley, and Shepherd Aves, alongside a fee increase to $50, drew significant opposition from neighborhood residents 3:22:23. Concerns focused heavily on safety (narrow streets, sightlines, young children playing), existing confusion over signage, enforcement effectiveness (many non-stickered cars reportedly park with impunity), and potential negative impacts on neighborhood character [3:43:47, 3:47:37, 4:08:59]. Supporters argued the need for more parking for residents from other precincts who drive to the beach [3:29:38, 3:54:49]. The Board tabled the decision, requesting more detailed maps, safety analysis (sightlines, emergency access), and clear signage proposals before reconsidering 4:16:22.

Other Key Actions: The Board approved a permit extension for Holcim 1:11:22, initiated a public process for Charter/Bylaw review 1:14:00, and debated/partially approved one-day liquor licenses for summer events, prompting a call for a formal policy discussion 1:27:25.

Overall: The meeting reflected a board grappling with balancing fiscal constraints, constituent service demands (retirees, beachgoers), quality of life issues (safety, parking), and foundational community values (anti-racism, equity). Several complex issues were advanced but require further data and community discussion.

Section 5: Analysis

This Select Board meeting showcased several recurring dynamics within Swampscott town government: the tension between fiscal conservatism and service demands, the challenge of balancing neighborhood concerns with town-wide access to resources, and the complexities of implementing public safety measures effectively.

COLA Debate: Fiscal Prudence vs. Human Impact: The 3-2 vote approving the additional 2% retiree COLA 2:35:54 starkly illustrated differing philosophies on the Board. Member Thompson’s impassioned plea focused squarely on the human element – the service rendered by retirees and their struggles on fixed incomes in an inflationary period 1:52:21. Conversely, Member Spellios and Chair Grischman grounded their opposition in long-term fiscal health, citing the town’s substantial unfunded liabilities and the precedent-setting risk for current employee contracts 2:10:10. Member Fletcher’s attempt to bridge this gap with a means-tested ARPA solution 1:56:57 was a pragmatic, albeit complex, alternative that acknowledged both fiscal limits and targeted need, but the Board ultimately faced a binary choice under the existing proposal and deadline. The close vote suggests this fundamental tension will continue to shape future budget and policy decisions.

Traffic & Parking: Data vs. Perception, Engineering vs. Enforcement: The pedestrian safety presentation and subsequent parking debate revealed significant friction. Captain Cable delivered a data-rich, theoretically sound argument prioritizing engineering over enforcement 2:38:01. His statistics positioned Swampscott PD as highly active in traffic enforcement compared to peers 3:19:04. However, this clashed sharply with resident testimony and Member Spellios’ critique, which highlighted persistent public dissatisfaction and questioned the real-world effectiveness of past efforts [4:00:07, 4:25:03]. The Captain’s presentation, while informative on engineering principles and bias concerns, came across as defensive regarding enforcement limitations, as Member Spellios pointed out 4:26:30. This defensiveness, coupled with the slow pace of implementing the long-advocated engineering solutions (one temporary speed pillow deployed 4:21:41), fueled frustration. The ensuing Phillips Beach parking debate further underscored the challenges. Residents presented compelling arguments about safety hazards in their specific neighborhood context 3:47:37, effectively countering the push for increased town-wide access. The Board’s decision to table the parking proposal pending more detailed safety analysis 4:16:22 was appropriate given the valid concerns raised, but it delays addressing the underlying demand for beach access cited by proponents 3:29:38. The effectiveness of future traffic calming and parking management hinges on bridging the gap between data/theory and resident experience, requiring proactive implementation of solutions (likely engineering-focused) and better communication.

Process and Communication: The meeting highlighted both strengths and weaknesses in town processes. The structured approach proposed for charter review, inviting broad input 1:14:00, shows a commitment to transparency. However, the public comment regarding the HWAC appointment 0:40:05 and resident frustration over notification and sign clarity in the beach parking issue [3:43:47, 3:59:05] suggest ongoing challenges in communication and procedural clarity for volunteers and the public. Similarly, the perceived disconnect between the police department’s stated preference for engineering solutions and the lack of tangible progress points to potential internal communication or prioritization issues that need addressing.

Board Dynamics: Chair Grischman’s attempt to enforce stricter decorum 0:02:18 had mixed results in a meeting with several passionate debates. The disagreement over alcohol at town events revealed differing views on community building and social responsibility [1:30:29, 1:34:27]. Member Spellios consistently adopted an analytical, detail-oriented questioning style, particularly evident in the RFP and traffic discussions, pushing for deeper understanding and challenging assumptions. The board demonstrated an ability to reach consensus on some items (Holcim extension, tabling parking) but showed clear splits on others (COLA, liquor license), reflecting diverse perspectives representative of the broader community. The overall tone, while occasionally tense, remained focused on substantive policy issues relevant to Swampscott residents.