[Speaker 5] (0:00 - 0:07)
Yes, so it's, it's the same, yeah, it's.

[Speaker 3] (0:10 - 0:12)
Yeah, I'm going to see if I can put up on the early fashion.

[Speaker 8] (0:13 - 0:14)
Probably a lot longer.

[Speaker 3] (0:14 - 0:15)
Yes, yes.

[Speaker 8] (0:15 - 0:21)
That's 41 feet. That's 41 feet.

[Speaker 2] (0:21 - 0:29)
They have that, it's for the sides, the sides of that. I mean, I don't think it really matters on the set, but if it's closer, as long as it's not closer to the current, it would fall on the ground.

[Speaker 8] (0:30 - 0:44)
You can see a lot of it. So they're not going to make a big bet. There's huge patience.

There's a huge cape. It's just a huge cape of it in here. I'm not sure if you can see it.

[Speaker 1] (0:47 - 0:48)
Just go ahead. I'm sure it's up there.

[Speaker 6] (0:54 - 0:59)
It's what relief is relief. That'd be just to find it. Just to find it.

Just to find it. Is that what it is? It's like a relief.

[Speaker 3] (0:59 - 1:08)
Did you upload it to the building? I think it probably doesn't matter if it's...

[Speaker 1] (1:12 - 1:30)
If it's a non-hormone, if the change is non-hormonal, then it's fine. If it's a hormonal change, then it's all right.

[Speaker 8] (1:39 - 1:46)
Here it is right here.

[Speaker 5] (1:47 - 2:18)
So this is... I might want to zoom out a little bit. Yeah, so you can kind of see the existing structure here.

And then this is the addition. So the existing side setback is here and here. And then this is much less.

And then we have the existing backyard setback goes from 41 to being before the 61.4 here. Thank you.

[Speaker 2] (2:22 - 2:29)
Is there anybody who has any questions about this petition here or online? If you're online, please use the raise hand button.

[Speaker 3] (2:38 - 2:40)
It doesn't look like it.

[Speaker 2] (2:41 - 2:51)
We constitute the board as the members for any present. And you feel as though you have a mark rather than a special permit.

[Speaker 1] (2:51 - 3:04)
The changes are informing changes on the non-hormone structure.

[Speaker 2] (3:11 - 3:19)
So what Mark means is that rather than a special permit, it's a written signing saying that this is not required.

[Speaker 1] (3:34 - 4:38)
So I'll make a motion on petition 24-02 that after review of the proposed plans, including the plot plan showing the dimensions of the proposed petition, that the work of the proposed work, which is subject to the petition, does not increase the non-hormone structure of the single family dwelling for the proposed work on a positive success of the proposed petition. Under the law, the zoning and zoning board feels that we can make a finding to the zoning and zoning plans that are on file. That would be a motion.

[Speaker 10] (4:40 - 4:42)
I'll second. All in favor?

[Speaker 1] (4:42 - 4:43)
Aye.

[Speaker 2] (4:45 - 5:38)
Thank you. Moving on to petition 24-03 which is a request for a special permit for a non-conforming structure over an existing non-conforming first story. And the property address is at 86 Windsor Ave. ...

... ... ...

Can you tell us about the project?

[Speaker 4] (5:40 - 6:23)
Can you just tell us what the project is? It's a small addition we're building up, second level, for a son and his son's girlfriend to just give them some extra space. It was over 800 square feet.

I think there was going to be a variance required for that so that they reconfigured the drawing to be 790 square feet so they could conform to the special permit, make the process a little bit easier. The open space kicks in with dining room, living room, then a single bedroom and a small bathroom with a laundry room in the attic. It's a small space, 790 square feet.

I'm not too familiar with the non-conforming part of it. I was just kind of thrown into it my first time coming to the board meeting. I don't have much for you, but that's about it.

[Speaker 2] (6:24 - 6:31)
Is this considered an accessory dwelling unit? Or is this considered a single family unit? Single family.

[Speaker 3] (6:34 - 6:37)
Is this going to be a bedroom or is this going to be an apartment?

[Speaker 2] (6:37 - 6:38)
This is going to be an apartment.

[Speaker 4] (6:38 - 6:45)
It's going to be an apartment, yeah. It's going to have a kitchenette and stuff in there.

[Speaker 2] (6:46 - 6:54)
So it's a kitchen, bathroom, bedroom, and then there's a attic kind of locked in space with laundry that could be in the second bedroom.

[Speaker 4] (7:00 - 7:08)
Do you know if the property is on the public sewer system?

[Speaker 7] (7:09 - 7:09)
Yes.

[Speaker 3] (7:15 - 7:46)
Just to clarify, one thing he said, and I think I mentioned this to you guys, where he said variance, it was just the difference between a dimensional special permit and a site-wide special permit. There was the original square footage that was 860, but we reduced it to 790 to get out of site-wide territory. So no variance.

[Speaker 2] (7:51 - 8:48)
It appears that the first floor is set far below the street. So when you drive by, you can't see the house. The house is lower than the road.

And therefore the addition will now be visible. Whereas currently the house is quite low. It's the same situation.

It's all we do. So it's all right. All we do is Is there Is there anybody who has questions?

[Speaker 3] (8:50 - 8:57)
Anyone on the team that wants to ask a question? Nope.

[Speaker 10] (8:57 - 9:04)
All right.

[Speaker 2] (9:08 - 9:29)
So the main house is this first floor. Is what's there. And then this is the addition.

So that's this is all addition.

[Speaker 4] (9:32 - 9:35)
He's got a drive-by that's got tiny spaces.

[Speaker 1] (9:39 - 9:41)
I want to see the tiny spaces.

[Speaker 4] (9:41 - 9:49)
I'm not 100% sure, but I've been on the property a couple of times. There's a long driveway and a couple of spaces there.

[Speaker 1] (9:54 - 10:03)
This is on the corner.

[Speaker 2] (10:06 - 10:28)
Windsor and the house right here.

[Speaker 1] (10:31 - 10:44)
So you went to the other side of the fence right there parking next to the white fence. It's on the long driveway.

[Speaker 2] (10:46 - 10:51)
It's on the long driveway. It's on the long driveway.

[Speaker 9] (10:54 - 11:03)
It looks like straddles. What do you mean?

[Speaker 6] (11:04 - 11:06)
It has to be recorded.

[Speaker 3] (11:09 - 11:11)
Recorded twice so to speak.

[Speaker 2] (11:11 - 11:18)
Yeah. What is that because it's on the floor?

[Speaker 1] (11:20 - 11:24)
Just like my house is the same way that we take it out of the register.

[Speaker 6] (11:28 - 11:47)
Any decision that affects any decision that affects the title to registered land by law has to be recorded on both sides. Registered land is where the registry is.

[Speaker 2] (11:49 - 11:52)
Is that something that all residents know?

[Speaker 6] (11:53 - 11:56)
Who files the decision?

[Speaker 3] (11:56 - 12:04)
We actually just took out a policy that's allowing us now to do the recording. So I will probably be going to the table for recording it.

[Speaker 1] (12:05 - 12:26)
It's a good question. The court won the decision. The house is actually partly built on a court of order.

Anyone that goes to the law is going to see it on the court of order side. What do you think?

[Speaker 7] (12:26 - 12:54)
I think under chapter 185 it's got to be on the court of order. It has to have legal notice of that. It has to be definitely on the registered side.

It's up to the registry to handle both. As long as the title is referenced like it is here then that should be enough. Is that two separate recordings?

[Speaker 1] (12:56 - 13:03)
Anytime I get a mortgage I have to record it twice. It adds up.

[Speaker 3] (13:11 - 13:19)
We just started taking up that fee in addition to the 400 hit fee that we have. It's a separate check.

[Speaker 1] (13:20 - 13:22)
It's a good point.

[Speaker 6] (13:24 - 13:30)
It's still less. The $105 is worth it.

[Speaker 3] (13:35 - 14:09)
I'll let Andres know then because he did give me a check for 105. I'll have to meet up with 105 every second recording. That was standard.

Entire home must be brought to current rules and regulations. Schedule set of plans indicating the location of protection devices throughout the entire home must be submitted in prior to apartment review.

[Speaker 2] (14:09 - 14:27)
This is another situation where what you need is a finding that a social apartment is not required because the addition is not more detrimental than a current non-renewable property.

[Speaker 9] (14:32 - 14:35)
Sounds like you just made it.

[Speaker 2] (14:38 - 14:50)
Again, I'm going to be writing anyway so I can walk you through what we did there. This is a good routine.

[Speaker 1] (14:59 - 16:53)
2024-083 to make a finding that the proposed addition says no new non-performative structure although it's required as a finding. Subject to work done in accordance with the plans on file. The reliever in terms of a signed finding shall be granted.

Also, payment of the additional recorded by the investigator. Can we have a motion to continue both petitions? I'll make a motion to continue petition.

Petition 123-19 petition 124-01. March 5th public hearing Second.

[Speaker 2] (16:58 - 17:01)
We have a motion to adjourn.

[Speaker 9] (17:01 - 17:02)
Second.

[Speaker 2] (17:04 - 17:06)
Good job, Paula.

[Speaker 1] (17:10 - 17:12)
It's all the work that was done.