Select Board Meeting — Swampscott, MA — February 11, 2026

Section 1: Agenda

Based on the flow of discussion, the following agenda items were addressed:

00:07:25 Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance
00:08:05 Recognition of Retiring Police Lieutenant Tom Hennessy
00:12:28 Appointment of New Treasurer-Collector (Liam Braley) — Motion and vote
00:15:17 2026 Black History Month Proclamation — Read by Ralph Edwards of Shore Diversity
00:20:33 Proclamation on Federal Immigration Enforcement, Civil Liberties, and the Protection of Human Life — Read by resident “Ms. Zoll” (Keiko)
00:23:46 Discussion: Swampscott’s Local Response to Federal Immigration Enforcement — Including Police Chief remarks on department policy and community guidance
00:32:30 Town Administrator’s Report — HR/staffing updates; Pine Street affordable housing milestone; DPW snow operations recognition; recognition of departing executive assistant Diane
00:45:00 Public Comment
00:48:15 Public Hearing: Richdale (444 Humphrey Street) — Amendment of existing Section 15 off-premises wine and malt beverage license to all-alcohol license; discussion and vote
00:55:43 Public Hearing: Pomona (128 Humphrey Street) — Alteration of premises under current wine and malt license; discussion and vote
01:02:18 FY2027 Budget Process Update — Capital Improvement Plan discussion; external budget drivers (GIC health insurance, collective bargaining, waste disposal, property/liability insurance, Essex Tech admissions lottery); excess levy capacity
01:37:12 Ratification of Police Union Contract (MCOP Local 417) — Confirmation of executive session vote and authorization to execute
01:46:00 Hawthorne Reuse RFP — Review and Discussion of Two Proposals — “Limited Time Only” and “Swampscott Center for the Performing Arts”
02:20:14 Consent Agenda — Early voting hours, Conservation Commission appointment, Anchor Food Pantry, meeting minutes
02:22:50 Select Board Time — Water/Sewer Infrastructure Committee goals; committee appointments
02:26:17 Adjournment

Section 2: Speaking Attendees

Note on Speaker Identification: This transcript was produced with automated speaker diarization, which frequently reassigns speaker labels mid-meeting. The same individual may appear under multiple “[Speaker X]” tags, and the same tag may refer to different people in different segments. The identifications below are best-effort inferences based on contextual clues, stated names, roles, and knowledge of Swampscott governance. Where identification is uncertain, the most specific generic role possible is used.

Inferred Identity	Speaker Tag(s)	Notes
Select Board Chair (likely Katie Phelan)	Primarily [Speaker 1], [Speaker 3], [Speaker 15]	Female; addressed as “Madam Chair.” Opens meeting, manages agenda, and calls votes across multiple segments. Speaker tag shifts throughout due to diarization.
”Doug” (Select Board Member)	[Speaker 6], possibly others	Called by name at 00:07:20 and 00:24:22. Advocates for ICE executive order, active in Hawthorne and budget discussions.
David Grishman (Select Board Member)	[Speaker 2], [Speaker 1] in some segments	Named “David” in multiple contexts. Served on Hawthorne evaluation committee. Described as a banker. Raises financial questions about both Hawthorne proposals.
Mary Ellen Fletcher (Select Board Member)	[Speaker 2], [Speaker 14] in some segments	Named directly. Questions capital plan vehicles, middle school timeline, and GIC. Liaison mentioned in capital plan discussion.
”Danielle” (Select Board Member)	[Speaker 4], [Speaker 21] in some segments	Named at 02:05:30. Liaison to Capital Improvement Committee. Raises concerns about long-term intent of Hawthorne proposals; advocates for public process before vote.
Town Administrator (“Nick”)	[Speaker 5], [Speaker 1], [Speaker 7], [Speaker 8] in various segments	Called “Nick” at 00:45:25 and elsewhere. Gives TA report. Leads Hawthorne evaluation committee. Relatively new to role (~1 year). Discusses budget drivers, waste disposal RFP, and hiring.
Police Chief	[Speaker 4], [Speaker 5], [Speaker 8] in various segments	Presents Lt. Hennessy recognition. Discusses immigration enforcement policy, Lunn v. Commonwealth, and LEITF role. Has Arizona SB 1070 experience. National co-chair of Law Enforcement Immigration Task Force. Name not stated.
Patrick (Finance Director)	[Speaker 8], [Speaker 12] in some segments	Referenced frequently by name. Discusses insurance, capital plan formatting, budget details.
Ralph Edwards (Shore Diversity member)	[Speaker 8] in proclamation segment	Identifies himself by name at 00:15:42. Reads Black History Month proclamation.
Ms. Zoll / “Keiko” (Resident)	[Speaker 4] in proclamation segment	Reads immigration enforcement proclamation. Credited with drafting the proclamation.
Brian Watson (Resident)	[Speaker 7] in public comment segment	Identifies himself at 00:45:38. Former Hawthorne Committee member. Offers letter with site plan observations for future Select Board consideration.
Liam Braley (Treasurer-Collector appointee)	[Speaker 7] in appointment segment	Joins remotely from Cary, NC. Graduate of Elon University; MPA from UNC Chapel Hill. Currently budget director in Cary.
Oscar Guerrero/Romero (Pomona owner)	[Speaker 11], [Speaker 6] in Pomona segment	Petitioner for alteration of premises. Joins remotely. Describes expansion into adjacent former salon space.
Chris (Attorney, Richdale)	[Speaker 7] in Richdale segment	Represents 444 Atlantic Inc. (Richdale). Joins remotely.
Marcy/Marzee (Community Development staff)	[Speaker 5] in some segments	Referenced as present; involved in Pine Street project and Hawthorne evaluation.

Section 3: Meeting Minutes

Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance 00:07:25

The Chair called the Swampscott Select Board meeting to order on Wednesday, February 11, 2026, noted the meeting was being recorded, and led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance.

Recognition of Retiring Police Lieutenant Tom Hennessy 00:08:05

The Chair introduced a recognition for Police Lieutenant Tom Hennessy, who retired the prior week after nearly 30 years of service with the Swampscott Police Department. The Police Chief spoke warmly of Hennessy, describing him as a lifelong Swampscott resident, a Georgetown graduate, and the department’s most decorated supervisor. The Chief noted that Hennessy was named MAD Officer of the Year multiple times, authored the grant securing the town’s municipal road safety program, and served as a mentor to younger officers. The Chief noted that Hennessy characteristically declined any retirement ceremony 00:08:22.

A board member who knew Hennessy personally from their shared neighborhood described him as modest, honorable, and deeply dedicated, recalling his community engagement at the farmer’s market and the police station, and noting that his father had served as a volunteer assistant harbormaster 00:10:38. The Select Board presented a signed citation and token of appreciation. The tone was unanimously warm; it was evident that Hennessy commanded deep respect across the department and the community.

Appointment of New Treasurer-Collector 00:12:28

The Town Administrator introduced Liam Braley as the town’s new Treasurer-Collector. Braley is relocating from Cary, North Carolina, where he serves as budget director. He holds a degree from Elon University and an MPA from UNC Chapel Hill. The TA noted that references from Cary were “absolutely glowing” and that Braley’s hiring will allow Finance Director Patrick to focus fully on finance director duties 00:13:11.

Braley, joining remotely, expressed enthusiasm for the role and his experience in cash management and municipal finance 00:14:10. He is expected to start in the first half of March.

Vote: Motion to appoint Liam Braley as Treasurer-Collector. Approved unanimously 00:15:10.

Black History Month Proclamation 00:15:17

The Chair introduced Ralph Edwards, a member of Shore Diversity, to read the 2026 Black History Month proclamation. Edwards thanked the Select Board and Town Administrator for the annual recognition and read the proclamation in full. The proclamation affirmed that Black history is American history, acknowledged the contributions of Black citizens to Swampscott’s development, celebrated the town’s progress in assembling its most diverse police and fire departments in history, and called on all residents, organizations, and institutions to honor Black heritage 00:16:01.

The proclamation announced a Black History Month celebration at Swampscott High School on Tuesday, February 24, from 5:30 to 7:30 PM. The Chair concluded by reading the closing language and noting the document was signed by the Select Board 00:19:55.

Proclamation on Federal Immigration Enforcement, Civil Liberties, and the Protection of Human Life 00:20:33

The Chair introduced Ms. Zoll (“Keiko”), a resident who helped draft the proclamation, which she read in full. The proclamation cited the January 2026 fatal shootings of two U.S. citizens — Renee Nicole Good and Alex Jeffrey Free Preti — during federal immigration enforcement operations, condemned the use of force and intimidation in civilian neighborhoods, and reaffirmed Swampscott’s commitment to the safety, dignity, and rights of all people 00:21:05.

Following the reading, extensive and impassioned discussion ensued among board members:

Member David Grishman 00:23:48 called on the town to follow the lead of Boston, Newton, Lynn, Somerville, Cambridge, and Chelsea in banning ICE from using municipal property for enforcement operations, stating: “I think we should do the same in Swampscott.”
Member Doug 00:24:23 thanked Keiko, acknowledged the sense of hopelessness many feel, and argued that even symbolic proclamations matter as “using our voices to express our dismay and anger.” He expressed cautious optimism that collective local action was beginning to “turn the tide.”
Another board member 00:25:46 echoed these sentiments, declaring: “If ever there was a time to not be quiet, it’s now.”
The Chair 00:26:43 disclosed that she had already contacted the Town Administrator about placing a formal ICE-related policy on the next meeting’s agenda, and invited the Police Chief to address the community.

The Police Chief then provided a detailed overview of the department’s immigration enforcement stance 00:27:37:

Swampscott Police does not enforce federal immigration law.
The department strictly adheres to Lunn v. Commonwealth (2017 SJC decision), which prohibits Massachusetts law enforcement from detaining individuals past their state release time.
No immigration information is collected; no assistance is provided for immigration enforcement.
The Chief disclosed that he serves as national co-chairperson of the Law Enforcement Immigration Task Force, a consortium of police chiefs and sheriffs advocating for sensible immigration reform, and that he provided subject matter expert testimony to Congress through Senator Padilla’s office in November 2025 00:28:26.
Residents were advised to contact the police department with any concerns about suspicious enforcement activity. The department would respond, record interactions on body cameras, and verify the legitimacy of any law enforcement activity 00:29:49.
The Chief noted the Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association is compiling national best-practice standards for communities and that he will testify before Essex County legislators on March 4 00:31:02.

The Town Administrator added that he has been consulting with KP Law about what cities and towns can do, and that the Attorney General’s office conducts regular webinars for communities. He committed to bringing a formal proposal to the February 25 meeting and suggested monthly updates from the Chief 00:32:34.

A board member praised the Chief’s experience, noting: “We’re incredibly lucky to have someone that has dealt with… immigration issues from a different part of the country here in Swampscott” 00:32:04.

Town Administrator’s Report 00:32:30

Staffing Updates:

Liam Braley (Treasurer-Collector) introduced earlier in the meeting.
Kylie Gates, a CPA and Salem State graduate, begins as Assistant Town Accountant the following week 00:33:55.
Shannon O’Leary, new executive assistant to the Select Board and TA, started her first day. She joins from Danvers.
Two conditional offers extended to police officer candidates. One acceptance confirmed, the other expected. This will leave one vacancy, with a new applicant cohort to be assembled. Candidates would likely enter the police academy in June or July 00:39:20.

The TA recognized Diane, the departing executive assistant, with personal and heartfelt thanks for her support and knowledge during his transition. Diane is moving to a role supporting the police and fire chiefs. Board members individually expressed gratitude for her service 00:37:16.

Pine Street Affordable Housing Project: The TA reported that the ZBA hearing on the Pine Street project closed the previous evening, marking a significant milestone. The project, developed in partnership with B’nai B’rith (BBH), aims to expand affordable housing, particularly for veterans. A 20-day appeal period follows. If no appeal is filed, the developer plans to submit a funding application to the Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities by March 19. Concurrently, the town will seek an engineering firm to design the culvert relocation funded through a prior grant 00:35:53.

Several board members raised important follow-up items:

The need for a long-term timeline to ensure marketing and lottery outreach to qualifying veterans 00:42:53.
Coordination with the senior center and veteran agents 00:43:37.
Proper timing of the veterans relocation so residents are not displaced 00:44:03.
A prior Select Board vote to establish a specific account for B’nai B’rith funds, which still needs Town Meeting action 00:44:15.

DPW Recognition: The TA commended the DPW for their response to three major snow events and multiple sanding operations, noting the significant multi-day effort to clear roads, sidewalks, Humphrey Street, and school routes 00:36:32.

Budget Preview: The TA noted the budget discussion would occur later in the meeting and highlighted that department heads had been asked to pursue level-service budgets with a target of 5% expense reduction where possible. Service contracts across IT, legal, and building operations are also under review 00:35:01.

Public Comment 00:45:00

Brian Watson 00:45:37 addressed the board regarding the Hawthorne property reuse. He referenced a letter he had submitted with four site maps, noting the letter is “both complimentary and complementary” to the Hawthorne Committee’s work but cautioning that areas around building heights, uses, square footages, and parking quantities need further exploration. He offered to participate in future working sessions and draw additional site plans, particularly if additional land is acquired. His comments were measured and constructive, clearly drawing on professional expertise.

No additional public comments were offered.

Public Hearing: Richdale All-Alcohol License (444 Humphrey Street) 00:48:15

The Chair opened a re-advertised public hearing on the application by 444 Atlantic Inc. (Richdale) for an amendment from a Section 15 off-premises wine and malt beverage license to an all-alcohol license. The board had previously approved changes to manager, officer, director, and shareholders at a December meeting; only the license type change remained.

The Chair read an opposition letter from George Allen, Sarah Spedden, and Gregory Allen of 27 Bayview Avenue (abutters), who argued there is no need for another all-alcohol off-premises license in a residential neighborhood given the new liquor store at 646 Humphrey Street 00:49:07.

The applicant’s attorney Chris, appearing remotely, confirmed no changes from the prior presentation 00:51:31.

Discussion was thoughtful. The Chair stated she had “done a lot of thinking about this” and concluded that based on available case law, she did not find grounds to deny the application. She noted the town’s small size (three square miles) and that “it doesn’t make sense to me to hold a license when we have a business owner who wants to use it” 00:52:01.

Vote: Motion to approve the license amendment. Passed, with one dissent 00:54:22. The dissenting member stated for the record that her “no” was “strictly because I feel that it does not benefit the community having another liquor store within a half a mile of each other. It has nothing to do with the people that own the market whatsoever” 00:54:27. Board Member Doug acknowledged the vote was not the “slam dunk” it initially appeared to be but supported approval on balance, expressing confidence in the store’s responsible operation 00:53:23.

The hearing was closed.

Public Hearing: Pomona Alteration of Premises (128 Humphrey Street) 00:55:43

The Chair opened a public hearing on an alteration of premises application for Pomona restaurant. After initial confusion — the board packet appeared to reference a license upgrade — the applicant Oscar Guerrero clarified they are seeking only an alteration of premises under their existing wine and malt license, not a change to all-alcohol 00:58:04.

Pomona has expanded into the adjacent former hair salon, growing to approximately 2,760 square feet. The expansion includes a bar with 10 seats, two handicap-accessible restrooms, and a new dining area with 10 tables and 30 seats. Oscar stated the changes would enhance guest experience and service flow without increasing noise or extending operating hours 00:58:30. He confirmed full compliance with TIPS certification and ABCC requirements.

Vote: Motion to approve the alteration of premises for Pomona under the current wine and malt license. Approved unanimously 01:01:58. Board members expressed enthusiasm, with one stating “Can’t wait to go check out the new Pomona” 01:02:00.

The hearing was closed.

FY2027 Budget Process Update 01:02:18

The Town Administrator presented a slide outlining key budget drivers — items with significant cost uncertainty that are largely outside the town’s direct control. The discussion was wide-ranging and at times deeply detailed, reflecting the board’s engagement with fiscal planning.

Capital Improvement Plan: Board Member Mary Ellen Fletcher raised concerns about capital plan scrutiny, specifically questioning a ~$90,000 vehicle purchase for a single driver and advocating for leaner capital spending given the looming middle school project 01:04:00. The TA clarified the vehicle is an electric replacement for the Fire Chief’s command vehicle (which also serves as emergency management equipment transport), replacing a 2006 Tahoe via a cascading replacement plan. The current Chief’s vehicle (a 2016 Ford Expedition) would cycle to the deputy chief.

The discussion broadened into a philosophical debate about capital spending norms. One board member cautioned against the “well, we typically spend five, six, seven million dollars… and that’s just our norm” approach, arguing for greater scrutiny of necessity 01:10:14. The TA committed to sharing the full capital plan with all board members and compiling detailed project descriptions for the next meeting.

Middle School Windows: The board confirmed the decision to proceed with middle school window replacement. The design firm (Socha Tech) has signed a contract. The plan is to have a hard cost number for the spring Town Meeting appropriation, with work to be completed in summer 2027 due to lead time for windows 01:13:42. The TA noted the school superintendent plans to come before the board soon regarding entering the MSBA (Massachusetts School Building Authority) program for a larger school project.

GIC Health Insurance 01:16:11: The TA reported the budget carries a conservative 14.5% GIC increase estimate (the historical high end). The GIC board votes on rates February 26. The TA expressed cautious optimism based on MMA conference discussions that the actual increase may be lower, providing potential budget relief. Separately, the TA is exploring a consultant engagement to evaluate alternatives — including buyout programs and different plan configurations — ahead of the town’s ability to exit GIC in FY2028 (contract up July 2027). Board Member Mary Ellen Fletcher and Member Doug emphasized the importance of beginning preparations now, citing their prior experience with the GIC exit process 01:19:14.

Collective Bargaining 01:20:50: Open contracts remain with fire, library, and DPW (the latter expiring end of FY26, with bargaining just beginning). Salary reserves will continue.

Waste Disposal 01:21:39: The TA described this as a source of significant concern, particularly after seeing Marblehead’s experience. A draft RFP is being reviewed by the Solid Waste Advisory Committee working group and KP Law. Positive factors for Swampscott include: (1) the town already has standardized automated trash barrels, saving a capital expense other communities face; (2) the small barrel size limits tonnage, potentially reducing tipping costs; and (3) the lower overall tonnage (~3,300 tons/year). The RFP will also address blue bag overflow procedures and whether existing large recycling containers can be accommodated by automated arms. A capital expenditure will be needed for standardized recycling barrels 01:22:19.

Property/Liability Insurance 01:25:50: Originally budgeted at 5%, preliminary estimates suggest a 9% increase. The town’s broker is marketing various policies to carriers, with results expected at a February 17 meeting.

Essex Tech Admissions Lottery 01:27:36: A significant change: due to a lawsuit, the Essex Tech admissions process has shifted from interviews to a blind lottery with reallocated community quotas. Swampscott’s minimum target is 23 seats (down from 30 current students); however, 39 students have applied, and the minimum is a floor — students could be admitted beyond 23 if other communities don’t fill their quotas. The TA noted this is a district-wide concern for non-city communities, and the lower barrier to entry (simple application vs. interviews) has inflated applicant numbers. The financial impact remains uncertain, as the town only pays for enrolled students 01:28:00.

Excess Levy Capacity: The TA confirmed the board’s December direction to build the budget at 2.5% plus new growth ($425K), noting this produces a deficit. He emphasized the current effort focuses on refining that deficit to a hard number. If cuts alone cannot close the gap, excess levy capacity would be used. Board Member Danielle noted that level-set funding would require “draconian cuts” eliminating entire departments, but urged the administration to “get it to its barest bones” before considering levy use, and stressed the need for a clear plan on working down any levy usage over time 01:34:00.

The TA noted the charter requires the budget to be submitted by March 1. The board acknowledged this timeline will be slightly missed due to meeting schedules, but noted this is the closest to compliance in recent history — progress given the staffing challenges the administration inherited 01:35:44.

Ratification of Police Union Contract (MCOP Local 417) 01:37:12

The Chair introduced the item to confirm the executive session vote and publicly ratify the collective bargaining agreement through June 30, 2028 (three-year term).

The Town Administrator provided a public summary of key terms 01:38:13:

Wages: 3% (Year 1), 2% (Year 2), 3% (Year 3), plus a 2% post stipend in Year 2.
Education Incentive: Addition of a Quinn Bill equivalent, designed to make Swampscott competitive in recruiting and retaining officers who were historically leaving for communities offering such incentives.
Vacation Calculation: Changes giving the Chief greater flexibility to manage overtime and department operations.
Various housekeeping items.

Board Member Doug raised the tension between collective bargaining costs exceeding financial guidelines and budget discipline 01:40:09. The TA argued the contract should be viewed alongside overtime management improvements and the alternative of potentially less favorable outcomes through JMLC (Joint Labor-Management Committee) binding mediation. Board Member Danielle reinforced this, noting the department’s chronic retention challenges — “we cannot retain talent” — and the costly cycle of hiring, training, and losing officers to better-compensated communities 01:42:49.

Member Doug, while raising the fiscal question, clarified he is “supportive of this” and wanted to ensure the public messaging was clear about the reasoning 01:43:50.

Another board member thanked the TA, KP Law, and the police union, noting the negotiation reached “a relatively reasonable position in a relatively speedy manner” compared to expectations 01:44:27.

Votes 01:45:21:

Motion to confirm the executive session vote and ratify the collective bargaining agreement through June 30, 2028. Approved unanimously.
Motion to authorize the Chair and Town Administrator to execute the agreement and related documents. Approved unanimously.

Hawthorne Reuse RFP — Review and Discussion 01:46:00

The Chair acknowledged David Grishman for serving on the evaluation committee and invited the TA to present the process and results.

Process: Two responses were received to the Hawthorne reuse RFP. Each team gave a ~20–30 minute presentation to a five-member evaluation committee (the TA, Rich Baldacci, Marcy from Community Development, Max Casper, and David Grishman), followed by Q&A. The committee met separately to discuss rankings 01:46:17.

Scores: The two proposals scored 93 and 91 out of a possible 175 — extremely close. The TA noted both proposals had room for improvement 01:47:15.

Proposal 1: “Limited Time Only” (Score: 93)

Concept: A beer hall / food-and-beverage activation with food served from food trucks or mobile concessions outside; limited interior improvements for quick launch 01:48:28.
Programming: Entertainment, community events, daytime use by senior groups and community organizations. A highlighted feature: partnership nights with nonprofits like Swampscott Youth Basketball, where a portion of proceeds benefits the partner organization 01:49:22.
Timeline: Aim to open by spring, as soon as weather permits.
Financials: ~$200,000 investment; ~$30,000 rent to the town over the 30-month term. No profit and loss statement provided. Funding from personal resources and potential local fundraising 01:51:52.
The proponents clearly understand the temporary nature of the lease — “limited time only is our name” 01:55:40.

Proposal 2: “Swampscott Center for the Performing Arts” (Score: 91)

Concept: Multi-venue activation including live music/entertainment in the former dining room, a kitchen build-out, a grab-and-go food operation in the former fish market space, and a “gateway nautical museum and gift shop” 01:56:04.
Principals: Led by individuals who operate Warwick, Beacon, and other venues in Marblehead — experienced hospitality operators 02:04:09.
Financials: $300,000 rent to the town over the term; $1 million in secured financing from a local financial institution for build-out. No profit and loss statement or pro forma provided; the proposers requested an NDA for financial details, which the town cannot enter due to public records requirements 02:15:45. Organizing as a nonprofit 02:02:37.
The proposal repeatedly references “long-term operation” despite the 30-month lease term 02:00:34.

Board Discussion — Notably Robust and Candid:

Board Member David Grishman raised significant concerns about the Performing Arts proposal’s financial feasibility, noting that with a $1 million build-out and $300,000 rent, at a typical 10% restaurant margin, the venture would need ~$13 million in sales over 30 months just to break even — a figure he found implausible 01:59:36. He also flagged the repeated references to “long-term operation” and the absence of any financial documentation from either bidder.

Board Member Danielle expressed similar discomfort: “I just can’t wrap my head around why somebody would want to sink in 1.3 million for thirty months and not have an intention beyond thirty months” 02:05:06. She was acutely conscious of the political constraints from Special Town Meeting: “I’m just really cognizant of what it took to get us to even this point, with the short leash that I felt like the town… kind of has us on” 02:05:32.

Board Member Doug offered a counterpoint, noting the Performing Arts team has a track record operating venues in Marblehead, which could justify the bank’s financing commitment, and that the financial risk ultimately falls on the tenant, not the town 02:09:05. He also cautioned against dismissing the higher financial offer.

The TA 02:06:02 reminded the board they are selecting the “most advantageous proposal to the town” and noted there are three options: Proposal 1, Proposal 2, or neither. He raised procurement guardrails — requesting additional financial information post-submission risks altering the competitive landscape, and any follow-up questions must be asked equally of both bidders.

Outcome: The board deferred the vote to the February 25 meeting. Board Member Danielle argued for the delay, stating: “this is a public process… we are just now discussing publicly what the elements of these both are. We should not vote on this tonight” 02:06:37. The TA will consult with KP Law and the Inspector General’s office on what additional questions can be asked within procurement rules. The board identified two key information gaps: (1) pro forma / financial substantiation from both bidders, and (2) realistic timeline to activation.

The Chair expressed gratitude to both applicants for responding: “We had to convince Town Meeting that this was even a process worth going down, and to have two choices… it’s nice to see” 02:19:33.

The consent agenda included:

Early voting hours for Town Hall: April 21, 23, 24 (8am–5pm) and April 22 (8am–7pm).
Conservation Commission appointment: Jerry Falco as a full-time member, replacing a current member stepping to alternate status.
Anchor Food Pantry: Use and occupancy agreement (a board member flagged that the annual extension document had not yet been finalized; the TA committed to placing it on the next agenda).
Meeting minutes: December 10, December 17, January 7, January 24. Board Member Mary Ellen Fletcher requested the January 21 minutes be removed and deferred to the next meeting.

Vote: Motion to approve the consent agenda as amended (without January 21 minutes). Approved unanimously 02:22:44.

Select Board Time 02:22:50

Water/Sewer Infrastructure Committee: Will present goals at the February 25 meeting. Board Member Mary Ellen Fletcher requested that the board appoint additional alternates to the committee. Another member suggested hearing the committee chair’s goals first to inform subsequent appointments. The liaison concurred and plans to have that discussion before adding members 02:23:24.
The Chair acknowledged the ZBA and all parties involved in advancing the Pine Street veterans housing project to its current milestone 02:25:34.
The broadcast crew (Nate Bystrom, Joe Dellett, and Mr. Mirecki) was thanked for their service.

Adjournment 02:26:17

Motion to adjourn. Approved unanimously.

Section 4: Executive Summary

Town Responds to Federal Immigration Enforcement with Proclamation and Policy Action

In what emerged as the meeting’s most emotionally charged segment, the Select Board formally condemned the killings of two U.S. citizens during federal immigration enforcement operations in January 2026. The proclamation — drafted by resident Keiko Zoll and signed by all board members — reaffirmed Swampscott’s commitment to safety, dignity, and constitutional rights for all people 00:20:33.

The discussion that followed was notable for its unanimity and intensity. Board members did not merely adopt a symbolic stance; they moved toward concrete action. The Chair disclosed she has already contacted the Town Administrator about placing a formal policy — following the lead of Boston, Newton, Lynn, and other communities that have banned ICE use of municipal property — on the February 25 agenda. The Police Chief provided an unusually detailed and authoritative briefing on department policy, his national advocacy role, and the legal framework (Lunn v. Commonwealth) that protects residents. He personally pledged body camera documentation of any suspicious enforcement activity and urged residents to call the department with concerns.

Why it matters: This positions Swampscott among the growing number of Massachusetts communities taking affirmative steps beyond existing state law protections. The Police Chief’s national expertise in immigration enforcement policy is a significant asset — a fact multiple board members explicitly acknowledged.

New Treasurer-Collector Appointed; Finance Team Nearing Full Strength

The board unanimously appointed Liam Braley from Cary, North Carolina, as Treasurer-Collector. Combined with the hiring of a new Assistant Town Accountant (Kylie Gates) and a new Executive Assistant (Shannon O’Leary), the town’s long-understaffed finance and administrative team is approaching full capacity for the first time under the current TA 00:12:28.

Why it matters: The TA has repeatedly cited staffing gaps as a constraint on budget process improvements and operational capacity. A fully built finance team is essential as the town navigates a complex FY27 budget with significant cost uncertainties.

FY27 Budget: Significant External Pressures Create Uncertain Picture

The budget discussion revealed an administration grappling with multiple large-dollar unknowns: GIC health insurance (carrying a 14.5% increase estimate, though actual rates may be lower), collective bargaining across four unions, a looming waste disposal contract, a 9% property/liability insurance increase, and the unpredictable financial impact of a new Essex Tech admissions lottery 01:02:18.

The board and TA appear aligned on the broad approach — build from a 2.5% levy increase plus new growth, cut operational expenses as deeply as possible, then use excess levy capacity to close any remaining gap — but tension exists over capital spending levels. Board Member Fletcher’s persistent questioning of individual capital items (particularly vehicles) and her emphasis on reserving financial capacity for the middle school reflects a longer-term fiscal perspective that may generate productive friction as the budget is finalized.

Why it matters: The budget will be presented at the February 25 meeting, slightly past the March 1 charter deadline. Several major cost variables won’t be resolved until late February or March. The excess levy capacity discussion will be the defining fiscal question of the spring.

Police Contract Ratified: Investment in Retention Over Three Years

The board unanimously ratified a three-year contract with MCOP Local 417 (through June 30, 2028) featuring 3/2/3% wage increases plus a Quinn Bill-equivalent education incentive — a significant new benefit designed to address chronic officer retention problems 01:38:13. Board Member Doug openly raised the fiscal tension of approving contracts that exceed financial guidelines, prompting a candid public discussion about the trade-offs between competitive compensation, retention costs, and overtime management.

Why it matters: Swampscott has struggled to retain police officers who leave for better-compensated communities. The education incentive represents a strategic shift toward retention investment, which the TA framed as potentially reducing costly overtime and hiring cycles.

Hawthorne Reuse: Two Proposals, No Vote Yet

The board received and discussed two proposals for a 30-month lease of the Hawthorne property — “Limited Time Only” (a lighter-touch beer hall/community activation concept) and “Swampscott Center for the Performing Arts” (a multi-venue entertainment and dining concept backed by experienced Marblehead operators). Scores from the evaluation committee were nearly identical (93 vs. 91 out of 175) 01:47:15.

The board deferred the vote to February 25, citing the need for public transparency, procurement-compliant follow-up questions (particularly on financial feasibility and activation timelines), and the sensitivity of the Hawthorne issue given the political capital expended at Special Town Meeting to authorize the lease process.

Why it matters: This is the first tangible step toward activating Swampscott’s most prominent vacant property. The outcome will signal whether the town can successfully execute a public-private interim use — a proof of concept that may inform longer-term redevelopment decisions.

Richdale Wins All-Alcohol License; Pomona Expansion Approved

In two separate public hearings, the board approved Richdale’s upgrade from wine-and-malt to all-alcohol (with one dissent) and Pomona’s expansion into adjacent commercial space (unanimously). The Richdale vote followed substantive debate about the proximity of another liquor store and community impact; the dissenting member made clear her objection was principled, not personal 00:54:27.

Pine Street Affordable Housing Advances

The ZBA hearing on the Pine Street veterans affordable housing project has closed. A 20-day appeal period is running. If no appeal is filed, the developer will submit a state funding application by March 19. Board members pressed for planning around veteran outreach, marketing timelines, relocation logistics, and the proper accounting of B’nai B’rith funds — items that will require Town Meeting action 00:35:53.

Section 5: Analysis

The Immigration Discussion Reveals a Unified Board with Practical Instincts

The immigration enforcement segment was the meeting’s emotional center of gravity, but what distinguished it from similar proclamations elsewhere was the speed with which the board moved from symbolism to specifics. Rather than simply reading a proclamation and moving on, the board used the moment to: (1) put a formal ICE policy on the next agenda; (2) extract a detailed public briefing from a Police Chief with national-level expertise; (3) commit to monthly updates; and (4) coordinate with KP Law, the Attorney General’s office, and Essex County legislators.

The Police Chief’s credentials are genuinely exceptional for a town of Swampscott’s size — national LEITF co-chair, congressional testimony, Arizona SB 1070 experience. Multiple board members explicitly acknowledged this as a unique asset. The Chief’s statement that the department has “never had any notification by ICE or DHS” is noteworthy and provides concrete reassurance alongside the legal and policy framework. The board’s approach — grounding its response in law (Lunn v. Commonwealth), institutional partnerships (MA Chiefs Association, AG’s office), and departmental policy rather than pure rhetoric — suggests the eventual formal action is likely to be carefully crafted and defensible.

Budget Dynamics: The Real Debate Hasn’t Started Yet

The FY27 budget discussion was presented as a process update, but the underlying tensions are already visible. The administration is clearly managing expectations — the slide of “drivers” (GIC, collective bargaining, waste, insurance, Essex Tech) is designed to prepare the board for a deficit number that will require excess levy capacity. The TA is strategic in how he frames this: these are community value decisions (how we pay employees, what waste service we want), not administrative failures.

Board Member Fletcher’s capital spending concerns — down to the specific vehicle level — represent a micro-level scrutiny that may or may not be productive at the board level but signals a healthy skepticism about institutional spending inertia. Her framing around the middle school as the defining capital priority (“the major driver for capital… in the future is the middle school”) provides a clear anchor for fiscal decision-making. The TA’s response was deft, noting the school project is “beyond the five-year plan” while validating the need for discipline.

The most revealing exchange was on excess levy capacity. When the TA noted the December direction was to build at 2.5% plus new growth, Board Member Danielle immediately pivoted to: “when we look at how much levy, we really have to be really clear on how we’re working down that number and how long we can sustain that.” This signals the board won’t simply rubber-stamp levy use — they’ll want a drawdown plan, which is exactly the kind of fiscal discipline framework that protects long-term budget sustainability.

The Hawthorne Decision Is More Complicated Than the Scores Suggest

The near-identical evaluation scores (93 vs. 91) mask fundamentally different risk profiles. “Limited Time Only” offers lower financial return ($30K rent) but higher probability of execution: lower capital requirements, faster activation, explicit alignment with the 30-month term, and a business model (food trucks, beer hall) that doesn’t require expensive build-out or complex permitting. “Swampscott Center for the Performing Arts” offers dramatically higher rent ($300K) and a more ambitious vision backed by experienced operators, but raises serious feasibility questions in a 30-month window — particularly a $1 million build-out for a temporary lease with no clear path to financial return.

Board Member Grishman’s back-of-the-envelope analysis ($13 million in sales needed to break even at 10% margins) was devastating in its simplicity and went largely unanswered. His observation that “even in the first sentence they’re mentioning long-term operation” speaks to a fundamental tension: the Performing Arts team appears to be proposing a permanent business plan for a temporary tenancy. Whether this reflects strategic optimism (hoping the town will extend the lease once a successful venue is established) or a genuine misunderstanding of the constraints, it creates political risk for a board that fought hard at Town Meeting to secure only 30 months.

Conversely, Board Member Doug’s counterpoint — that the Performing Arts operators have a proven track record and the financial risk is theirs, not the town’s — is valid. The question is whether the board is evaluating financial risk to the tenant (which is indeed the tenant’s problem) or the reputational and political risk to the Select Board of selecting a proposal that may not materialize as described. Given the Hawthorne property’s fraught political history, the latter calculus may ultimately dominate.

The TA’s careful procurement guardrails — particularly his concern about asking post-submission questions that could be challenged by non-bidders — demonstrate appropriate process consciousness. The decision to defer to February 25 was wise; it preserves both public legitimacy and the board’s flexibility to gather additional information within procurement rules.

Police Contract Ratification: A Candid Public Airing of Fiscal Trade-offs

Board Member Doug’s decision to raise the fiscal policy tension publicly — “how do we enter collective bargaining agreements that are outside of our financial guidelines without blowing up our budgets?” — while simultaneously confirming his support was a deliberate act of public transparency. He was not opposing the contract; he was ensuring the public record reflected the board’s awareness of the trade-off and the reasoning behind it.

The TA’s and other members’ responses provided a comprehensive public justification: JMLC risk, retention economics, overtime management flexibility, and the practical reality that under-compensating police officers produces a more expensive outcome (constant turnover, training costs, and overtime) than investing in competitive pay and education incentives. This exchange was the kind of substantive fiscal governance that builds public trust — showing that the board weighed competing considerations rather than simply approving what was presented.

Staffing Progress as a Governance Milestone

The seemingly routine HR announcements — new Treasurer-Collector, new Assistant Accountant, new Executive Assistant, two police conditional offers — actually represent a quietly significant governance milestone. The TA has been vocal about staffing gaps constraining the town’s operational capacity, and the assembly of a near-complete team sets the stage for the more rigorous budget process he has promised (August preliminary projections, earlier timeline compliance). Board Member Danielle’s explicit acknowledgment that this year’s budget timeline, while still slightly behind the charter requirement, represents the closest compliance “in recent history” suggests the board recognizes and is tracking this institutional progress.

2026-02-11: Select Board